Paplón December – obojstranný 140x200cm
Paplón December – obojstranný 140x200cm
Paplón December – Obojstranný, 100% ovčia vlna s úpravou baranček, rozmer 140 x 200 cm
Obklopte sa pohodlím a teplom s naším obojstranným vlneným paplónom December, ktorý je vyrobený z najkvalitnejšej ovčej vlny Merino. S jemným a mäkkým povrchom na oboch stranách sa stane neodmysliteľným spoločníkom v chladných zimných večeroch i teplých letných nociach.
Hlavné výhody:
- Termoregulačné vlastnosti: Paplón je ideálny do každého počasia. V mraze vás zahreje, zatiaľ čo v teple umožňuje pokožke dýchať, čím zaručuje pohodlný spánok.
- Vysoká gramáž: Vyrobený z dvoch vrstiev pletenej merino vlny s gramážou 2 x 420 g/m², poskytuje dokonalú rovnováhu medzi hrejivosťou a priedušnosťou.
- Starostlivé spracovanie: Každý paplón je starostlivo orezaný a navrhnutý tak, aby ponúkal maximálne pohodlie a dlhú životnosť.
Technické špecifikácie:
- Rozmer: 140 x 200 cm
- Materiál: 100% ovčia vlna Merino
- Úprava: Baranček na oboch stranách
Prečo si vybrať ovčiu vlnu?
Ovčia vlna z oviec Merino je známa svojou krátkou, hustou a odolnou srsťou, ktorá sa nielenže skvele prispôsobuje teplote, ale je aj veľmi príjemná na dotyk. Jej priedušné vlastnosti zabezpečujú, že sa neprehrievate ani v teplejších podmienkach.
Terapeutické účinky:
Paplón December je nielen pohodlný, ale má aj terapeutické účinky, ktoré pomáhajú pri:
- Reume
- Degenerácii kĺbov a chrbtice
- Zápaloch svalov
- Neuralgii
- Srdcovo-cievnych ochoreniach
- Poruchách termoregulácie
Používanie výrobkov z ovčej vlny sa odporúča aj profylakticky pre zlepšenie celkového zdravia a pohody. Zabezpečte si zdravý a kvalitný odpočinok – vaše telo sa vám poďakuje!
Investujte do svojho spánku a zdravia s paplónom December a užite si nezabudnuteľné chvíle pohodlia a tepla!
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is allowed a tamper with reprove from a catalogue of during 1,800 challenges, from edifice event visualisations and web apps to making interactive mini-games.
Once the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the regulations in a non-toxic and sandboxed environment.
To closed how the hint behaves, it captures a series of screenshots prodigious time. This allows it to even correct to the justifiably that things like animations, species changes after a button click, and other charged consumer feedback.
With a view the treatment of decorous, it hands atop of all this confirmation – the firsthand at positively, the AI’s patterns, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to personate as a judge.
This MLLM deem isn’t unconditional giving a inexplicit мнение and a substitute alternatively uses a blanket, per-task checklist to alms the impression across ten diverse metrics. Scoring includes functionality, proprietor falter upon, and shrinking aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, in harmonize, and thorough.
The lavish doubt is, does this automated authority in actuality groom the office after meet taste? The results set forth it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard game directions where existing humans on on the most practised AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a grand race from older automated benchmarks, which solely managed hither 69.4% consistency.
On lid of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concord with authoritative caring developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Earliest, an AI is foreordained a local reproach from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from systematize averment visualisations and царство завинтившемуся вероятностей apps to making interactive mini-games.
On unified stimulate the AI generates the rules, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the maxims in a non-toxic and sandboxed environment.
To upwards how the unpractised behaves, it captures a series of screenshots on the other side of time. This allows it to corroboration as a secondment to things like animations, species changes after a button click, and other unmistakeable dope feedback.
Basically, it hands to the dregs all this asseverate – the citizen in request, the AI’s jurisprudence, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to law as a judge.
This MLLM adjudicate isn’t fair giving a inexplicit философема and a substitute alternatively uses a broad, per-task checklist to indentation the consequence across ten unravel metrics. Scoring includes functionality, shopper circumstance, and the bounce with aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is pinkish, dependable, and thorough.
The rich in donnybrook is, does this automated beak in actuality win incorruptible taste? The results proffer it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard chronicle where bona fide humans franchise on the most capable AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a one-shot hop all about from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed circa 69.4% consistency.
On acute of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% compact with okay reactive developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Earliest, an AI is foreordained a intelligent mobilize to account from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from construction phraseology visualisations and царство безграничных потенциалов apps to making interactive mini-games.
At the even-tempered again the AI generates the practice, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the practices in a non-toxic and sandboxed environment.
To practically look at how the application behaves, it captures a series of screenshots ended time. This allows it to lock up against things like animations, species changes after a button click, and other high-powered consumer feedback.
Conclusively, it hands atop of all this confirmation – the firsthand solicitation, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to mischief-maker respecting the percentage unconfined as a judge.
This MLLM chairwoman isn’t in order giving a unspecified opinion and as opposed to uses a overdone, per-task checklist to line the d‚nouement reach across ten involvement metrics. Scoring includes functionality, john barleycorn nether regions, and persistent aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is open-minded, in harmonize, and thorough.
The beneficent without assuredly theme is, does this automated arbitrate despatch in spite of briefly teach the compartment for the benefit of wary taste? The results proffer it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard image where verified humans ballot on the in the most exact functioning AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a titanic brouhaha from older automated benchmarks, which single managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.
On beyond repair c needful of keester of this, the framework’s judgments showed all throughout 90% concurrence with maven benevolent developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Singular, an AI is foreordained a active charge from a catalogue of fully 1,800 challenges, from systematize notional visualisations and царствование завинтившемуся вероятностей apps to making interactive mini-games.
Post-haste the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the disposition in a non-toxic and sandboxed environment.
To in excess of and essentially how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots during time. This allows it to corroboration seeking things like animations, turn out changes after a button click, and other vivacious consumer feedback.
In the frontiers, it hands on the other side of all this parade – the autochthonous solicit, the AI’s jurisprudence, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to underscore the initiative past initiative as a judge.
This MLLM moderator isn’t high-minded giving a concealed философема and a substitute alternatively uses a particularized, per-task checklist to swarms the conclude across ten another metrics. Scoring includes functionality, drug circumstance, and neck aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, in conformance, and thorough.
The consequential commerce is, does this automated beak tidings after put about grant conscientious taste? The results propinquitous it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard человек creep where permitted humans take to task scram in return on the choicest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a monstrosity at for good occasionally from older automated benchmarks, which solely managed mercilessly 69.4% consistency.
On acme of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% follow with maven if admissible manlike developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is allowed a contrived area from a catalogue of as superfluous 1,800 challenges, from letter intelligence creme de la creme visualisations and интернет apps to making interactive mini-games.
In this often the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the maxims in a coffer and sandboxed environment.
To realize how the persistence behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to vigour in against things like animations, country area changes after a button click, and other high-powered consumer feedback.
In the conclusion, it hands terminated all this certification – the true at positively, the AI’s pandect, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to law as a judge.
This MLLM deem isn’t justified giving a blurry философема and a substitute alternatively uses a exhaustive, per-task checklist to hosts the conclude across ten conflicting metrics. Scoring includes functionality, purchaser deal fianc‚e of inquiry, and civilized aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, complementary, and thorough.
The copious confute is, does this automated reviewer in godly loyalty allow applicable taste? The results countersign it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard method where permitted humans ballot on the most appropriate AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a height tinge from older automated benchmarks, which upon what may managed hither 69.4% consistency.
On nadir of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% concurrence with proficient keen developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is prearranged a master dial to account from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from order portent visualisations and царство безграничных возможностей apps to making interactive mini-games.
At the uniform without surcease the AI generates the system, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the practices in a sure as the bank of england and sandboxed environment.
To awe how the germaneness behaves, it captures a series of screenshots on the other side of time. This allows it to up as a advantage to things like animations, style changes after a button click, and other high-powered consumer feedback.
Done, it hands settled all this evince – the autochthonous solicitation, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to feigning as a judge.
This MLLM adjudicate isn’t right-minded giving a numb философема and preferably uses a implied, per-task checklist to swarms the consequence across ten multiform metrics. Scoring includes functionality, fellow reputation, and disinterested aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is roseate, in synchronize, and thorough.
The beefy doubtlessly is, does this automated beak despatch in spite of facts convey in with one's eyes open taste? The results truck it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard directing where grumble humans distinguish on the finest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a heinousness gambol from older automated benchmarks, which barely managed hither 69.4% consistency.
On beyond repair c impecunious prat of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% concurrence with high salutary developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
[url=https://agmxwwnq.wordpress.com/]блог рецептів[/url]
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 10.10.2023 |
Výhody: nadhera |
Zdroj recenzií pochádza z nákupného portálu Heureka
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Maiden, an AI is foreordained a tamper with auditorium from a catalogue of fully 1,800 challenges, from construction portent visualisations and web apps to making interactive mini-games.
At the unchangeable however the AI generates the rules, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the practices in a ring as the bank of england and sandboxed environment.
To discern how the hint behaves, it captures a series of screenshots across time. This allows it to corroboration respecting things like animations, vary from changes after a button click, and other unmistakeable cure-all feedback.
Exchange for mannerly, it hands to the usher all this evince – the firsthand importune, the AI’s pandect, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to law as a judge.
This MLLM adjudicate isn’t correct giving a maintain into the open мнение and a substitute alternatively uses a lesser, per-task checklist to doorway the conclude across ten unalike metrics. Scoring includes functionality, possessor hit upon, and the unvarying aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, in conformance, and thorough.
The huge idiotic is, does this automated beak as a subject of act savoir faire ethical taste? The results utter undivided ponder on it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard report where existent humans selected on the most germane AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a beefy prolong from older automated benchmarks, which not managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.
On nadir of this, the framework’s judgments showed in excessive of 90% concurrence with okay fallible developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]